Appreciations
THE IPCRESS FILE
It’s
hard to realize today what an impact Len
Deighton’s remarkable spy novel had on its first appearance
in the 1960s. Like
le Carré, Deighton was reacting against the glossy,
unrealistic depiction of
espionage in the novels of Ian Fleming (a certain Puritanism was a
factor at
the time, less à propos these days, now
that Fleming’s considerable
virtues have been recognized). But certainly The Ipcress File,
with its
insolent working-class hero and low-key treatment of all the quotidian
details
of a spy's life (endless futile requisitions for petty cash, a
decidedly
unglamorous secret service HQ) was astonishingly fresh, while the
first-person
narrative was a sardonic Londoner’s refraction of Chandler’s
Marlowe-speak two decades on. Another radical
touch was the refusal to neatly tie up the narrative with a cathartic
death for
the villain – the shadowy opponent of Deighton’s
unnamed protagonist is – for
political reasons – unpunished. A series of novels in the
same vein followed,
none quite as impressive as this debut – but all highly
accomplished.
- Barry Forshaw,
editor of British Crime Writing Encyclopedia
This
is something Michael Caine agrees with me
about. Or perhaps it’s the other way around. Either way, we
both regret that
Deighton’s An Expensive Place To
Die was (like companion volume Horse Under Water) never made into a
Harry Palmer film. But then again, maybe it is just as well. It is
impossible
to summarise the plot in that two-sentence pitch Hollywood
still loves (“It’s Goldfinger Meets Raymond Blanc
at The Priory”), so getting a
workable script would have been a nightmare. Remember, legend has it
that if
any friend told Deighton they could follow the plot of The
Ipcress File, he would jumble it up some
more. Deighton put the storyline of AEPD
into a Moulinex and left it to
run. There is a
shady artist, explosive
dossiers, double-double- crosses, institutionalised voyeurism and
Chinese
nuclear weapons. It doesn’t
matter
because the book is a love letter to two things: the
(brilliantly rendered) exoticism of Paris
in
the sixties and a certain anonymous
English spy, described as ‘truculent and cynical’
on my book flap,
but also whip-smart and unflappable.
Reading it, you can well see why a young Michael Caine imagined himself
walking
off the page. The character that the movies christened ‘Harry
Palmer’ became
synonymous with Swinging London and Cold War Berlin,
but this Deighton reeks of garlic, Gauloise and cuisine faite
par le patron,
as well as governmental
treachery. My copy may have the
one of the worst jackets of all time, in which the hero is rendered,
alarmingly, as a Mr. Bean look-a-like, but in many ways the book
hasn’t dated
at all. All you have to do is change the E-Type to an XF, give him a
mobile
phone and the world-weary, put-up, suspicious secret agent would fit
nicely
into the world of Spooks. And Paris
is
still an Expensive Place To Die.
-
Robert
Ryan author of Empire of Sand and Underdogs
Len
Deighton added a change of direction in
espionage fiction from the glamour and excesses of Ian
Fleming’s James Bond,
into the downbeat reality of life behind the looking glass with his
cynical
anti-hero Harry Palmer. The Palmer novels were of course The
Ipcress File
[1962], Horse Under Water [1963], Funeral
in Berlin [1964], Billion
Dollar Brain [1966], A Expensive Place to Die
[1967], Spy Story
[1974] and Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Spy [1976] US
title Catch a
Falling Spy. Incidentally as they all feature first person
narration; the
protagonist Harry Palmer is never actually named and in fact in the
last two
novels, Deighton stated that the protagonist [Patrick Armstrong] is a
different
character than in the preceding four.
It
was the film versions that gave the anti-hero
his name. For many readers however, Harry Palmer would be the
antithesis of Ian
Fleming’s James Bond, especially when one compares the actors
who played James
Bond at the time. Sean Connery’s James Bond, compared to
Micheal Caine’s Harry
Palmer was a polar opposite. Coincidentally
Bond producer Harry Saltzman was also involved with the Harry Palmer
films. The
protagonist in these novels [Harry Palmer] is a Grammar school boy
working for
Public school boys, and cynical toward the world he sees around him,
they are
required reading for anyone with interests in British espionage fiction
of that
period.
My
personal favourite of the Palmer novels is of
course The Ipcress File [1962], because it was the
first Deighton novel
that passed my table; but also its blue collar hero’s insight
is delightful.
The tale reveals that the hunt for a missing scientist is linked to a
large
scale conspiracy that only the working class hero can solve.
–
Ali
Karim assistant Editor of archive.shotsmag.co.uk
CLOSE UP
Most of the
best writers are versatile. While they may
achieve fame through one particular novel, or type of novel, they are
likely to
have the breadth of mind, and talent, to turn their hand to a wide
range of
different subjects. Len Deighton will always be associated with the spy
novel,
and I have long been a fan of books like Bilion
Dollar Brain and Horse Under Water.
But
I admire some of his other work just as much. I’m not
qualified to judge his
cookery books, or his travel guides, but I enjoyed Only
When I Larf, and, perhaps even more, the routinely overlooked
Close-Up.
Close-Up was published
in 1972, and I read it a
couple of years later. It’s set in the film world and
presents the story of a
fading star called Marshall Stone. Deighton spent some time working in
the
movie business, and he put his experience of the business to good use.
The gap
between image and reality is convincingly portrayed. Above all, the
material
offers tremendous scope for Deighton’s sardonic humour. Not
least right at the
end when the mogul Koolman says: ‘Close-Up.
I’d never buy a title like that. It’ll mean nothing
on a marquee in Omaha.’.
- Martin
Edwards, crime writer and legal expert
I
first met Len Deighton in the Mucky Duck (aka The
White Swan, the Daily Mail pub off Fleet Street)
when The Ipcress File had just hit
the best-seller lists. He
couldn't
believe his luck. Up to then he'd been known - if at all - as a cookery
writer
in national papers. Nice bloke, he seemed then.
As
for the films,
I think they worked very well.
Caine was particularly good as Harry Palmer (not that
Deighton ever gave
his hero a name). Billion
Dollar
Brain was the least impressive of the movies but then it was
extremely
complicated and by that time there was a lot of Hollywood
money involved (to say nothing of the eccentric Ken Russell) and
everything
became too overblown.
Personally
- though I very much took to the guy - I
wasn't all that happy with Deighton.
At
the time I'd just written my first spy novel, The Matter of
Mandrake,
rather in the James Bond genre, and I wasn't too chuffed about some
bloke coming
along and moving the whole business from upper and middle to the
working
class. But his were
bloody good books
and I still enjoy the films.
- Barry Norman, thriller writer and film critic.
I
well remember the first time I met Len. He had
come to a meeting of the Crime Writers Association with a view to
joining;
somehow or another we began talking. The meeting came to an end and Len
said to
me "Come and have a
meal
somewhere". We went to a nearby Chinese where the waiter had some
difficulty using both serving spoon and fork in the one hand. Len
looked up at
him and said simply: "It's difficult, isn't it? I used to have the same
trouble when I was an aircraft steward".
Awkward
situation vanishing in an airy puff of smoke. And I thought What a simply nice man he
is. A belief I
have kept to this day.
- H.R.F.
Keating creator of the Inspector Ghote crime series
SS-GB
SS-GB is
a remarkable crime novel, set in 1941 London, but in an England which has lost
the war and is occupied by
the Nazis and from the opening line of dialogue –
“Himmler’s got the King
locked up in the Tower of London”
– you know you are in classic Deighton
territory.
The
plot revolves around the murder of a scientist in a seedy back room in
Shepherd’s Market and the detective work of the upright and
honourable Douglas
Archer (“of the Yard”), one of the Metropolitan
Police’s top cops. Archer has a
shrewd idea “whodunit” almost from the off, but
that’s not the point, for the
murder turns out to be only the tip of a serpentine trail of espionage,
double-crossing and triple-crossing which involves atomic research, the
fate of
the imprisoned King George VI, the neutrality of the United States and,
of
course (this being the author of The
Ipcress File) the deadly rivalry between various intelligence
agencies as
to who will be top dog.
There
are
some marvellous set pieces: the chilling raid by the SS on the school
of the
widowed Archer’s son, the surreal escape of the King from the
Tower which
results in him being pushed in a wheelchair through fog-bound London,
the
blowing up of Karl Marx’s grave in Highgate Cemetery during a
celebration of
Nazi-Soviet relations and the sinister, quite chilling, appearance of a
face at
a train window which turns out to belong to Heinrich Himmler.
But
the
dark heart of the story is what Deighton does best: the internecine
warfare
between protagonists supposedly on the same side. In SS-GB,
the power struggle is between the seemingly jovial
Gruppenfuhrer Kellerman of the SS and Standartenfuhrer Huth of the SD
(the SS’s
intelligence service), which reprises the scenario of Dalby and Ross
always
jostling for position in The Ipcress File.
In all such battles, of course, there is collateral damage which drives
the
tension and allows amasterful author to make some crucial observations
of human
nature.
Critics
of
the book may say it is simply The Ipcress
File re-written as imaginary history. Well if it is, so what?
Just
sit
back and marvel at the imagination it took to do it.
- Mike Ripley creator of the
Angel crime series and keen archaeologist
BOMBER
I came to
Deighton as a result of Ipcress File,
which is certainly an excellent book and film, but
for me his greatest work has to be Bomber.
It is a magnificent anti-war work, and shows the courage of the young
bombers
without glorifying their work. Rather, by looking at the victims of the
bombing
run, it shows the futility of their actions.
The story
itself looks at the final raid of
a Lancaster. Pilot Sam
Lambert has made it from the
beginning of the war to this point, and although he’s
suffering from exhaustion
and nervous strain, his crew revere him. They count on him as their
talisman.
But the pathfinder Mosquito is shot apart and her load of incendiaries,
designed to mark out a city (Krefeld) instead falls
short, and the whole
exercise is set to drop on a small town, Altgarten.
More recently
there have been explanations of the full
horror of towns which were bombed in this way. Deighton describes in
precise,
clinical detail how the multiple fires lead to a firestorm, and what
that means
for the poor inhabitants.
And that is his
great skill. This story is
not one person’s tale. It is a set of interlinked lives, and
he looks at the
attack from all points of view. It is this which gives the story its
enormous
power. And, of course, its horror.
I’d
recommend the book to anyone.
-Mike
Jecks
hailed as the master of the medieval murder mystery
FUNERAL IN BERLIN
It’s
iniquitous to have to pick out one of
Deighton’s many masterpieces but if I’ve got to it
has to be Funeral in Berlin.
Deighton’s
take on spies and the Cold War always seemed more realistic to me than
that of
his rivals. He didn’t go for the fake glamour of Fleming.
This was espionage as
it ought to be if you think about it: rough, raw, cold and inhuman. Funeral
in Berlin magnifies this sense of the ‘great
game’ by putting chess at the
heart of the book, with a quotation about the game fronting every
chapter.
The
Russian Colonel Stok boasts about being one of
the best chess players and asks the anonymous British hero whether he
liked the
game too. Our man (who is not, as any Deighton fan knows, called Harry
Palmer),
replies, ‘Yes, but I prefer games where there is a better
chance to cheat.’
Which
makes him the better spy, naturally. Deighton
as his best was unique, an original who could handle character and plot
with
extraordinary aplomb, and make places like Berlin,
torn apart by the Wall, seem as real as any grotty London
suburb. One of the 20th century greats.
- David Hewson author of the
Nic Costa thrillers
BILLION DOLLAR BRAIN
I first made
the acquaintance of Len Deighton over
forty years ago when we spent a rainy weekend in a caravan on the Devon coast. Someone
had left behind copies of The Ipcress File,
Horse Under Water and
Funeral
in Berlin. I was
captivated by them and have been a
devoted fan of Deighton’s work ever since. He really
qualifies as a member of
the Magic Circle because his
spy novels find new conjuring tricks every time. Of the
other books, Bomber is my
favourite.
But if I got stuck in a caravan during a storm again, the novel
I’d prefer to
re-read would be Billion Dollar Brain.
It’s fast, funny, idiosyncratic, unashamedly corny and it
contains just enough
information about the subjects on which it touches to give the
impression that
the author is an expert on each one. Only a master storyteller can do
that.
- Keith Miles aka Edward
Marston
LEN DEIGHTON’S COOKBOOKS
Whenever I make
an omelette, I think of Len Deighton.
A couple of years ago, the BBC screened a documentary in which the
great man
revealed that he always adds a tiny splash of water to a bowl of
freshly
cracked eggs. Ever the scientist, Deighton had learned that the shell
of an egg
is porous; water vapour is apparently escaping through it all the time.
Before
cooking, the discerning chef should always restore the egg’s
molecular
structure with a tiny amount of water.
Does it work?
Don’t ask me. But plenty of
Deighton’s other cooking tips, culled from his culinary
classics Ou Est Le Garlic? and Len Deighton’s Action Cook Book, have served me well for many
years. Did you know, for example, that if you’re putting oil
and vinegar onto a
salad, you should always put the vinegar on first, otherwise the oil
creates a
coating on the lettuce upon which the vinegar will be unable to obtain
a grip?
Len taught me that.
If
I’m making Deighton sound overly
fastidious, I don’t mean to. When it comes to cooking, he is
a man of immense
learning, but also one determined to take the mystery out of the
process of
turning raw ingredients into simple, delicious meals. Deighton was, for
a time,
The Observer’s cookery writer, the Nigel Slater of the
Swinging Sixties, and
every week would draw a simple cartoon strip to illustrate the
stage-by-stage
process of preparing a particular dish. These strips are reproduced in Ou Est Le Garlic? and the Action
Cook Book. They show the amateur
cook how to prepare everything from a simple chicken stock to Coquilles
St
Jacques, from a hollandaise sauce to Osso Buco. Legend has it that one
of the
strips is hanging in Michael Caine’s kitchen in the film of The Ipcress File.
There is no
doubt that the books, which
were published in the mid-1960s, were intended partly to cash in on the
huge
success of Deighton’s early novels. The Action
Cook Book, in particular, was marketed at trendy British
bachelors who
wanted to act like Harry Palmer but froze in terror at the sight of a
potato.
The cover of my copy shows a woman in a negligée running her
fingers through
the hair of a square-jawed brute busily tossing a pan of spaghetti
while
winking at the camera. The implication is clear. Learn how to stuff a
Chicken
Kiev properly, lads, and you’ll have her clothes off in no
time.
But these are
serious cookbooks. I wouldn’t
trade mine for any of the so-called modern classics by Gordon and Jamie
and
Nigella. Long before Heston Blumenthal came along with his egg and
bacon ice
cream and his canister of liquid nitrogen, the young Len Deighton was
schooling
himself in the science of French cuisine. There’s very little
the author of Billion Dollar Brain
doesn’t know about
the boiling point of clarified butter or the impact of heat on a shin
of veal.
But he doesn’t make you feel bad for your culinary ignorance.
Quite the
opposite, in fact. The books are chatty and low key, with that lovely
dry wit
which characterises the novels. Here is Deighton on vinaigrettes:
“American
cooks add half a dozen more
garnishes to salad dressing, including lemon peel, chopped cheese,
curry
powder, ketchup and, even more terrible, sugar. I give you this
information to
demonstrate the depths of depravity to which it is possible to
sink.”
Of course, being forty years old,
certain elements in the books are out-of-date. There’s a bit
too much stuff
involving aspic, and a recipe for tripe and onions which should be
consigned to
a time capsule. Rumour has it that an enterprising editor at Harper
Perennial
has hit on the idea of repackaging the cookbooks for a 21st
century
audience. I certainly hope that’s true, and I certainly hope
that the all-new
versions won’t excise these anachronistic details. They are
part of the books’
charm. In my view, Ou Est Le Garlic?
and Len Deighton’s Action Cook Book
are classics of British cuisine, and every bit as central to
Deighton’s
reputation as Harry Palmer, Bomber,
and Hook Line and Sinker.
-Charles Cumming, author of TYPHOON
Okay,
I’ll come clean. I’m a great fan of all Len
Deighton’s work, but my favourite thriller is his Action Cookbook (and its companion Où est le Garlic?). For over
forty years, and decades before it
became top of the pops at UK restaurants,
his crème
brûlée has thrilled my family and
friends. In my single days
in the 1960s these two cookbooks were both full of information and of
such
delights as garlic mayonnaise, Baked Alaska, cheesecake, mousses,
pommes de
terre Dauphinoise, caper sauce, sabayon... All well known to us now,
but then?
Wow, how they thrilled.
Thank you, Len
Deighton, and happy
birthday. Both books are still thrilling me today.
-
Amy Myers author of
the Auguste Didier series
My main interest
in Len Deighton lies in his membership of the select band of writers
who have
imagined that World War II went the other way, and the Germans and
Japanese
won. The necessary premise almost always is that Churchill is dead by
1940 or
1941 – Deighton has him killed by Himmler, the royal family
imprisoned and the
SS in Whitehall.
It’s a long time since I read SS GB
(published 1978) but I seem to remember that he sticks to the immediate
period
of his alternative history. The other hands set their stories well into
the
aftermath of the war. Fatherland (Robert Harris) is
evidently taking
place in the Sixties, with a nice little aside to the Beatles launching
their
career in Hamburg just as they
did in ‘real’ history. Giles
Cooper’s disturbing TV play The Other Man
went out in 1964
as a contemporary yarn of an upright British army officer doing the
Nazis’
bidding in a protracted racial war in Asia. Inside every
decent man, Cooper was suggesting, is
this ‘other man’ waiting to take over.
Another television work, Philip Mackie’s three-part An
Englishman’s Castle (1978),
depended on what might be called the mirrored mirror image. Kenneth
More, as a
drama producer in the German-monitored BBC, daringly
embarks upon a soap opera of
life as it might have been if Britain had not been
subjugated. Which brings us
to the wizard of this whole genre, Philip K.Dick. The Man in
the High Castle (1960) has the
Germans ruling the Eastern
American states, the Japanese the Western, but separated by the
demilitarised
buffer zone of the Rocky Mountains. There
lives the title figure, writing his alternative history and making it
perhaps
too wishful a picture of super-power America. So Dick
flirts, just for a moment, with
an astonishing possibility. His main character, a Japanese official in San Francisco, suffers a
dizzy spell while walking in
his city, Suddenly the clean, peaceful streets are full of cars. And
ahead of
him looms a vast structure shutting out the sky and carrying yet more
automobiles. ‘What’s that?’ he mumbles to
a passing stranger. ‘Awful, ain’t it?
That’s the Embarcadero Freeway.’ Mr
Tagomi has been vouchsafed a glimpse
of the world as we have it. Though Len Deighton had shown
himself to be a
master of the trompe l’oeil when he
revealed in The Ipcress File
that the hideous foreign prison in which his hero had been tormented
was
actually in London, I
don’t think he ever risked pulling the
rug from under his own feet quite so confidently.
- Philip Purser, thriller writer and former television critic.
Horse Under Water
Horse Under Water is the odd one out among
Len Deighton's first four spy novels, and I have the feeling that it's not quite
as well known as the others. Perhaps it is because it was not filmed. Or perhaps
it is that, unlike the other three, it turns its back on the Cold War and looks
instead at the aftermath of World War Two. Of course, when Horse Under Water
was published in 1963, the war was a not so distant memory. The story is
about the attempt to recover the cargo of a U-boat sunk off the Portuguese
coast, which contains a Russian doll-like set of secrets. At first it seems to
be counterfeit money, then it turns out to be heroin - the 'horse'
of the title - and then it materialises as a compromising list
of the British high-ups who would have collaborated after a Nazi invasion. The
main villain here is a Cabinet minister and the scene where the narrator
confronts him is a little like the scenes where Bond faces Dr
No/Goldfinger/Blofeld. Except that Deighton makes it realistic. Realism is the
keynote in these books, from the footnotes to the mysterious acronyms like
W.C.O.O.(P) to the explanation of how secret information is stored. Maybe it was
all true, maybe none of it was. I suspect it's about half and half, though. No
spy writer has ever done with such cool authority.
- Philip Gooden, author of the historical Nick Revell series
|